nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
浙西北大桥坞地区黄尖组火山碎屑岩异源碎屑特征及物源分析
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(41703042)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2026-06-05
出版时间: 2026-06-05
网络发布时间: 2026-06-05
移动端阅读
摘要:

白垩纪时期东南沿海出露了大量的流纹质火山碎屑岩,这些岩石物源复杂,含有大量异源碎屑,限制了学界通过全岩化学组成探讨火山岩的成因与演化,异源碎屑物质来源的研究一直较薄弱。此外,这些火山碎屑岩也是我国重要的热液型铀矿床赋矿围岩类型,对其物源开展分析有助于推动铀元素来源的研究。本文对浙西北大桥坞地区的火山碎屑岩开展研究,野外观察和岩相学鉴定发现火山碎屑岩中裹挟的异源碎屑包括正变质岩、副变质岩、花岗岩岩屑等。对火山岩中的异源碎屑开展挑纯工作并进行主量、微量元素分析。对比分析结果发现,部分主量元素和微量元素含量受到异源碎屑的影响,表现出一定程度的变化,特别是Ce、Gd、Tb等,例如挑纯后的样品Gd含量集中分布在9.4×10-6~13.6×10-6,高于挑纯前4.9×10-6~11.1×10-6;挑纯后样品Tb含量变化于1.3×10-6~2.2×10-6,也高于挑纯前0.8×10-6~1.8×10-6,表明该地区的火山碎屑岩受到一定程度异源碎屑物质的混染,改变了初始火山岩的物质组成。通过元素的协变图解,发现异源碎屑物质的来源可能主要同浙西北陈蔡群副变质岩有关,而花岗岩、石英岩混染作用不明显。此外,前人对火山碎屑岩中锆石的研究发现了陈蔡群同期的720~850 Ma的基底捕获锆石,也印证了陈蔡群副变质岩的混入。因此,浙西北大桥坞火山碎屑岩在喷发的过程中,穿过基底变质岩地层时炸碎并裹挟了一部分碎屑物质,其中主要以陈蔡群副变质岩为主。

Abstract:

Large volumes of rhyolitic pyroclastic rocks were exposed along the southeastern coastal region during the Cretaceous, these rocks show complex provenance and contain abundant exotic clasts, which lowers the potentials of whole-rock geochemical compositions to explore the genesis and evolution of these volcanic rocks. Researches on the sources of these exotic detrital materials have rarely been carried out previously. In addition, these pyroclastic rocks are important host rocks for hydrothermal uranium deposits in China. Therefore, provenance analysis of these rocks is of great significance for advancing studies on the sources of uranium. Here we present a case study of the pyroclastic rocks in the Daqiaowu area. Field investigations and petrographic studies suggest that xenolithic debris entrained within the pyroclastic rocks includes fragments of ortho- and parametamorphic rocks, as well as granite clasts. After removing the xenolithic debris, major and trace element analyses were carried out on both debris-removed and untreated samples. The analytical results indicate, to some extent, variations in several major and trace elements between the two groups, such as Ce, Gd, and Tb. For example, Gd contents in the debris-removed samples range from 9.4×10-6 to 13.6×10-6, which is higher than those of the untreated samples (4.9×10-6–11.1×10-6). A similar pattern is observed for Tb, with concentrations of 1.3×10-6–2.2×10-6 in the debris-removed samples compared to 0.8×10-6–1.8×10-6 in the untreated samples. This suggests that pyroclastic rocks were indeed contaminated by xenolithic debris, to some extent, changing original geochemistry for volcanic rocks. Element co-variation diagrams reflect a source of the Chencai Group parametamorphic rock, rather than granite and quartzite, for xenolithic debris. Furthermore, previous zircon dating of pyroclastic rocks revealed some xenocryst zircons of 720~850 Ma simultaneous with the Chencai Group, this also demonstrate a contribution of basement parametamorphic rock debris. Thus, during the eruption of pyroclastic rocks in the Daqiaowu area, some basement metamorphic rocks were broken to debris as explosion and entrapped in the magma, xenolithic debris was dominately sourced from the Chencai Group parametamorphic rocks.

参考文献

[1]Zhou X M,Sun T,Shen W Z,et al. Petrogenesis of Mesozoic granitoids and volcanic rocks in South China: a response to tectonic evolution [J]. Episodes,2006,29(1): 26-33.

[2]Liu L,Xu X S,Xia Y. Cretaceous Pacific plate movement beneath SE China: Evidence from episodic volcanism and related intrusions [J]. Tectonophysics,2014,614: 170-184.

[3]Liu L,Xu X S,Zou H B. Episodic eruptions of the Late Mesozoic volcanic sequences in southeastern Zhejiang,SE China: Petrogenesis and implications for the geodynamics of paleo-Pacific subduction [J]. Lithos,2012,154: 166-180.

[4]王非,杨列坤,王磊, 等. 中国东南晚中生代火山沉积地层界线时代:~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar年代学及磁性地层研究[J].中国科学:地球科学,2010,40(11):1552-1570,1617-1630.

[5] YANG S Y, JIANG S Y, ZHAO K D, et al. Petrogenesis and tectonic significance of Early Cretaceous high-Zr rhyolite in the Dazhou uranium district,Gan-Hang Belt,Southeast China [J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2013, 74: 303-315.

[6] YANG S Y, JIANG S Y, ZHAO K D, et al. Geochronology,geochemistry and tectonic significance of two Early Cretaceous A-type granites in the Gan-Hang Belt,Southeast China [J]. Lithos, 2012, 150: 155-170.

[7]王洪作,陈培荣,吴俊奇,等. 浙江大桥坞铀矿床火山岩锆石形态学与年代学研究[J]. 地质学报,2017,91(3):571-587.

[8] WANG H Z, CHEN P R, SUN L Q, et al. Magma mixing and crust–mantle interaction in southeast China during the Early Cretaceous: Evidence from the Furongshan granite porphyry and mafic microgranular enclaves [J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2015,111: 72-87.

[9] WONG J, SUN M, XING G F, et al. Geochemical and zircon U–Pb and Hf isotopic study of the Baijuhuajian metaluminous A-type granite: Extension at 125-100 Ma and its tectonic significance for South China [J]. Lithos,2009,112(3/4): 289-305.

[10] WANG D Z, SHU L S. Late Mesozoic basin and range tectonics and related magmatism in southeast China[J]. Geoscience Frontiers,2012,3(2): 109-124.

[11] WANG H Z, CHEN P R, WANG K X, et al. Cretaceous A-type volcanic–intrusive rocks and simultaneous mafic rocks along the Gan-Hang Tectonic Belt,southeast China: petrogenesis and implications for the transition of crust–mantle interaction [J]. International Geology Review,2018,60(11/12/13/14): 1684-1706.

[12]PENG H W, FAN H R, JIANG P, et al. Two-stage rollbacks of the paleo-Pacific plate beneath the Cathaysia block during Cretaceous: Insights from A-type granites and volcanic rocks [J]. Gondwana Research, 2021, 97:158-175.

[13]Zhang, W., Wang, B., Tang, Y, et al. Hydrothermal Alteration and element migration patterns in the Zhangjiawu uranium deposit, northern Zhejiang Province, China[J]. Minerals, 2023, 13(3): 335.

[14]王正其,李子颖,汤江伟等. 浙西北地区大桥坞铀矿床硫同位素特征研究[J]. 铀矿地质,2012,28(2):90-94,123.

[15]刘蓉蓉,李子颖,韩效忠等. 双桥—新路地区铀矿成矿条件分析[J]. 世界核地质科学,2009,26(1):9-17.

[16]王洪作. 赣杭构造带晚中生代产铀火山—侵入杂岩成因与铀成矿关系[D]. 南京大学,2015.

[17] 王洪作,吴俊奇,陈培荣,等. 大桥坞产铀火山-侵入杂岩的岩浆混合作用及其对赣杭构造带铀成矿潜力的指示意义[J]. 高校地质学报,2016,(1): 30-42.

[18]邓家瑞,张志平. 赣杭构造带前寒武纪构造格局的探讨[J]. 铀矿地质,1997,13(6): 321-326.

[19] QI Y Q, HU R Z, LIU S, et al. Geochemical and Sr--Nd--Pb isotopic compositions of Mesozoic mafic dikes from the Gan-Hang tectonic belt,South China: petrogenesis and geodynamic significance [J]. International Geology Review,2012,54(8): 920-939.

[20]余心起,吴淦国,舒良树,等. 白垩纪时期赣杭构造带的伸展作用[J]. 地学前缘,2006,13(3): 31-43.

[21]Gilder S A,Gill J,Coe R S,et al. Isotopic and paleomagnetic constraints on the Mesozoic tectonic evolution of south China [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,1996,101(7):16137-16154.

[22]Xiao W J,He H Q. Early Mesozoic thrust tectonics of the northwest Zhejiang region (Southeast China) [J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin,2005,117(7-8): 945-961.

[23]高剑峰,陆建军,赖鸣远,等. 岩石样品中微量元素的高分辨率等离子质谱分析[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学),2003,(6): 844-850.

[24]张彦杰,廖圣兵,周效华,等. 皖赣相邻鄣公山地区变泥砂质岩石元素组成特征及源区分析[J]. 中国地质,2012,39(5):1183-1198.

[25]唐红峰,刘丛强,谢国刚. 区域变质作用中岩石的质量迁移和元素活动--以庐山双桥山群变泥质岩系为例[J]. 地质论评,2000,46(3): 245-254.

[26]时国,郭福生,谢财富,等. 赣中相山铀矿田基底变质岩原岩恢复及其形成环境[J]. 中国地质,2015,42(2): 457-468.

[27]李景运,马生明,席明杰,等. 浙江江山—绍兴断裂带陈蔡群微量元素地球化学特征及其与成矿的关系[J]. 现代地质,2016,30(3): 493-502.

[28]董学发,唐增才,陈忠大等. 浙江龙游地区基性及镁质变质岩的地球化学特征及其构造环境[J]. 地球科学,2016,41(8):1322-1333.

[29]McDonough W F, Sun S S. The composition of the Earth [J]. Chemical Geology,1995,120(3/4):223-253.

[30]Sun S S,McDonough W F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts : implications for mantle composition and processes [J]. Geological Society,London,Special Publications,1989,42(1):313-345.

[31]章邦桐,胡恭任,王湘云,等. 相山地区变质基底新认识及其原岩归属的对比研究[J].铀矿地质,1997,13(1): 1-7.

[32]梁良,钟芝筠. 浙江绍兴—诸暨地区双溪坞群构造环境的元素地球化学判据[J]. 浙江国土资源,1989 (2):43-51.

[33]廖圣兵,张彦杰,周效华,等. 皖赣相邻地区双桥山群沉积序列及沉积环境分析[J]. 现代地质,2016,30(1):130-143.

[34]Li Z X,Li X H. Formation of the 1300-km-wide intracontinental orogen and postorogenic magmatic province in Mesozoic South China: a flat-slab subduction model [J]. Geology,2007,35(2):179-182.

[35]Zhou X M,Li W X. Origin of Late Mesozoic igneous rocks in southeastern China: implications for lithosphere subduction and underplating of mafic magmas [J]. Tectonophysics,2000,326(3-4): 269-287.

[36]刘磊. 中国东南部晚中生代幕式火山岩浆作用及古太平洋板块俯冲机制[D]. 南京大学,2015.

[37]Wang Y, Gan C, Tan Q, et al. Early Neoproterozoic (~840 Ma) slab window in South China: key magmatic records in the Chencai Complex[J]. Precambrian Research, 2018, 314: 434-451.

[38]章邦桐,凌洪飞,沉谓州,等. 浙江双溪坞群Sm-Nd同位素年龄的确定和Sm-Nd体系在陈蔡群正斜长角闪岩中重置现象的发现[J]. 地球科学进展,1992,7(4):94-94.

[39]胡艳华,顾明光,徐岩,等. 浙江诸暨地区陈蔡群加里东期变质年龄的确认及其地质意义[J]. 地质通报,2011,30(11):1661-1670.

[40]徐步台. 浙东南古基底变质岩的同位素地质年代问题[J]. 地质论评,1987,33(5): 468-474.

[41]Li Z X,Li X H,Wartho J A, et al. Magmatic and metamorphic events during the early Paleozoic Wuyi-Yunkai orogeny,southeastern South China: new age constraints and pressure-temperature conditions[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin,2010,122(5-6):772-793.

[42]高林志,丁孝忠,刘燕学,等. 江山-绍兴断裂带陈蔡岩群片麻岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J]. 地质通报,2014,(5): 641-648.

[43]孔祥生,包超民,顾明光. 浙江诸暨地区陈蔡群主要地质特征及其构造演化探讨[J]. 浙江国土资源,1994,10(1):15-29.

基本信息:

中图分类号:P588.211

引用信息:

[1]张智星,顾陆宁,郭芳菊,等.浙西北大桥坞地区黄尖组火山碎屑岩异源碎屑特征及物源分析[J].南通大学学报(自然科学版)().

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(41703042)

发布时间:

2026-06-05

出版时间:

2026-06-05

网络发布时间:

2026-06-05

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文